What mistakes do we make when evaluating our marketing strategies?

What mistakes do we make when evaluating our marketing strategies?

Possible answers (10)

. Confident statements of our incompetent team members mask their professional qualification ().
. A common mistake in evaluating the effectiveness of any campaign is the congruence bias. An error occurs when one or more team members assess the situation as a whole, taking into account only the data they have directly impacted. As a result, third-party events that could have the same, and sometimes more impact on the results are ignored.
. Colleagues responsible for analyzing the results unconsciously manipulated or misinterpreted the data.
. We were wrong in our conclusions because we analyzed the results obtained only in one of several categories. In fact, the data we did not receive has distorted our understanding of the whole situation.
. From the very beginning, we were "tied" to some numbers. As a result, we created incorrect expectations, KPIs, etc.
. We unconsciously changed our data analysis methodology because of the high contrast of the latest results in relation to the previous ones.
. At one of the previous stages of the analysis, we did not correctly determine the correct sample size (the minimum number of participants in our experiment). As a result, by extrapolating the data from the sample to the general group of users, we got an incorrect picture of reality.
. We did not correctly calculate the time required to obtain the desired result. There are two possible options here: 1. The promotion campaign itself was shorter than the time necessary; 2. We did not wait for the right time to evaluate its results.
. We relied on the respondents' responses, which were given following the effect of social desirability. As a result, they did not reflect the real picture that interested us.
. We may have made a number of small but fundamental mistakes at various stages of developing our data analysis framework. Later, we greatly overestimated our ability to "clean up" already distorted data.

Related questions

How useful you found this?
Not useful
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Not useful
Very useful
Thank you for your contribution!
previous bias
next bias
keepsimple logo
picLog In
My ProfileSettingsLog Out

UX CORE GUIDE

arrow downHow to use

UXCG is a free tool that helps teams detect cognitive bias-related UX problems across all product stages, whether you're prototyping, testing, or improving a live product

How to use UXCG

  1. Choose your product stage below;
  2. Find your question (either manually or through search);
  3. Read possible answers.

Each answer explains how cognitive biases relate to your specific situation. Since you understand your context best, you can apply the insights directly. While the tool doesn't provide ready solutions due to each case's uniqueness, it reveals new perspectives backed by cognitive science.

Label description
Questions related to in-house team members cooperation (product, development teams and others).
Questions related to product development stage (from concept to first public release).
Questions related to sales, marketing funnels, prospects and leads communication, and overall product packaging.
Questions related to user interaction with actual product and its features.
Questions related to product analytical data analysis.
search icon
Select your product stage
#10.

Why do users complain about the quality of our support?

#30.

What common mistakes do we make when dealing with product analytics?

#41.

What should we do if our colleagues’ stubbornness is hurting teamwork?

#43.

What to consider when planning product releases?

#45.

What to do if our team members do not share their opinion?

#50.

How to deal with an incompetent colleague/manager?

#59.

What should we consider when referencing political, social, or economic events in our messages?

#61.

What should we do if our team wastes too much time on minor details?

Be Kind. Do Good.